Please welcome Sarah Smith, who will
be the keynote speaker at the 10th Write Now Conference April 29, 2017, in
Raleigh, North Carolina. Please tell our
readers a little bit about you, such as why did you become an Editor?
Sarah- When I was 8, my older brother and I launched the
Gunderson Gazette, a hand-written two-page newspaper we created for the
families on our block and photocopied at the local library. We charged 25 cents
for a 3-issue subscription, and I’m sure it was both terrible and charming
(sadly, no copies exist today). While I enjoyed interviewing my neighbors and
writing about back yards and impending births, what I really loved was figuring
out what we were going to write about, how much room each article should get,
and what on earth we should do about reluctant sources. I definitely didn’t
know it at the time, but that was the start of my career packaging and
problem-solving. The other reason I’m an editor is also because of my
background: My mother is a writer, and I grew up steeped in the tricky,
time-consuming, exhilarating process of reporting and writing (how many times
did I have to say, “Mom? Mom?” before she heard me when she was on deadline? A
million). I always admired her hard work, and wanted to be a part of that
process in a way that made sense for what I was best at.
Nancy- Please tell our readers about
the magazine you represent.
Sarah- REDBOOK is a magazine for the
kind of woman in her 30’s and 40’s who cares
about her hair and about her health. Smart style advice
lives alongside the latest medical research; beauty how-tos are followed by
heartfelt personal stories. Our millions of readers live in the real—and
sometimes messy—world, so we give them clothes that fit bodies that aren’t
model size, home ideas that don’t make them feel guilty, money advice that
works whether you’re a CEO or a nurse’s aide, thoughtful essays that make them
think, and myriad ways to feel smarter, confident and more in control.
Nancy- What is your weekly routine
like?
Sarah- We’re always working on at
least two issues at once, but where we are in the cycle determines whether I
get home for dinner with my family, in time to read my son his bedtime stories,
or miss all of that entirely. On quiet weeks, some of the things I do are
attend planning meetings, put together our issue lineups, assign articles, help
staff editors with the stories they’re responsible for, write revision letters,
write display, and edit copy. Busy weeks mean I’m approving art and final
drafts of stories, writing all the things nobody thinks of as needing to be
written (look at the spine of a magazine; are there words there? Someone like
me wrote those), and solving myriad tiny but crucial problems that get us
closer to getting the magazine to the printer on time. It sounds like the quiet
weeks are busier, and in some ways there’s more actual work then, but there is nothing quite like
the drama and excitement of wrapping everything up.
Nancy- For
authors or prospective authors: what influences your decision to read a
submission: the query letter, synopsis, the plot, etc.
Sarah- I can never say this enough: Your
query letter is a writing sample. And the biggest thing I’m looking for is
style. What does that mean? Two things: One, that you have read my magazine and
have a sense of the tone we take. REDBOOK is smart but not egg-heady, funny but
not goofy, and down-to-earth but not boring. And two: That you have style. There are writers who can
“put a sentence together,” as we like to say, and then there are ones that
bring a little sparkle to anything they write, no matter what the topic or
publication. As a huge magazine working to stay relevant in a vast field of
content, REDBOOK relies heavily on the quality of our writing on every page:
feature stories, yes, but also captions and short items/blurbs (which should
never, ever be referred to as “filler”—it’s a huge pet peeve of mine, since
writing short and snappy is absolutely the hardest thing to master). Story
ideas matter too, of course, but someone with wit and verve with a
close-but-not-quite-right idea is always going to get more encouragement than
someone with a solid idea but flat writing. We cover the same things year after
year: The difference is in the writing. How do you be the person who writes
with style? I have two pieces of advice, both of which I’m sure TAF writers
know, because my understanding is that they are a smart and hard-working bunch:
Write, and read. You have to practice to get good, but you also have to immerse
yourself in all kinds of writing in order for your own to improve.
Nancy- What is the biggest no no you
see in submissions that makes you reject them?
Sarah- Besides writing that doesn’t grab me, the easiest way to
get turned down is to suggest you write a regular column. It’s not because you
couldn’t do it: There are many people who have 10-12 illuminating, unusual, and
different things to say over the course of a year of issues, but this kind of
gig is something you really have to build up to. Here’s another minor pet peeve
of mine: Telling me the exact word count of the story you have (“I’d like to
submit my 1,137 word piece on…”) because there’s very little chance that I (as
an editor of a women’s magazine, notorious for requesting changes and shaping
things in our vision) will buy it as-is. So implying the piece is complete at
this very specific length says to me that you are not open to being edited. And
the thing that gets you a second assignment
is a willingness to revise.
Nancy- What do you see ahead in your
career?
Sarah- I love being an executive
editor—it’s what I wanted from the day I met the woman who become my third
boss, the then-executive editor at Parenting. She is an enormously talented and
sane editor, and I wanted to keep the ship humming along like she did, making
the words great and the staff happy. I hope jobs like mine still exist in five
or ten years: My title and work might not look just like it does now, but I
hope I’ll still be helping writers, editors, and designers find just the right
way to tell a story that resonates with readers.
Nancy- Will you share some
encouraging words for authors still struggling for that first submission
contract? Also, how can our readers find your submission
guidelines?
Sarah- Let me tell you a little
story. A writer pitched me an essay that I enjoyed reading, but the topic just
wasn’t right for us. So she pitched me another, and I said no again—better
topic, but in this case, the piece didn’t really go anywhere. She tried me
again a couple months later with a pitch for a reported story, and I was
pondering that one when I suddenly had a need for an essay on a very specific
topic (the boss wants what the boss wants, you know?). Who was going to write
it?? I shot her an email to say, “Does this sound like something you could
write about?” She said yes, and wrote a beautiful piece and was so incredibly
lovely to work with that I now am so delighted whenever I hear from her. You
might think, “I’ll never get lucky like that,” but I guarantee you, that kind
of “luck” happens a lot. You’ve got to keep trying, because you need to be top
of mind when editors need something. If you get feedback, heed it. If you
don’t, try to figure out why not on your own, and do better next time. Do not
give up: No article is done on the first draft, and no writer gets picked up on
the first pitch. On your fiftieth pitch? Change something up: The outlets
you’re trying, the topics you’re pitching, the way you’re writing. You will get
a hit, and all the effort is absolutely worth your time. You’re getting writing
practice, which is essential, but you’re also building your stamina for hard
work, which is what editors value at least as highly as top-notch writing. (A
great writer who won’t do a revision is not actually so great a writer.)
REDBOOK doesn’t have traditional
writer’s guidelines anymore. Why? I’ll be honest: It’s because they were for
people who weren’t real writers, people who maybe had one great, personal story
to tell and wanted a chance to reach out and share that idea. Professional
writers who get assignments have always come to us more directly: They read the
magazine carefully, they look at the masthead to find an editor to reach out
to, and then they try to build a relationship that way. This is good news,
because if you go to all that trouble, it means we will take you seriously in a
way that was a real challenge for writers of “slush pile” submissions.
More About Sarah
Sarah Smith is the executive editor
of REDBOOK, the 113-year-old magazine named Adweek’s Hottest Women’s Magazine
in 2015. Under Sarah’s direction, Redbook has won several MIN Awards as well as
a Clarions from the Association for Women in Communications. Prior to her time
at REDBOOK, Sarah was the editorial director of Kiwi, and a member of the
senior staff at Parenting. She lives in Manhattan with her husband and son.
Facebook: facebook.com/redbook
Insta: @redbookmag
Twitter: @redbookmag
You can find even more information
about Sarah Smith at:
Find out more and register HERE
Great post! Loved reading about her childhood publishing venture with her older brother. You also got her to share good advice and insight into the editorial process - very helpful!
ReplyDeleteI agree and cannot wait to meet her when she speaks April 29th in Raleigh
ReplyDeleteGreat post. Good interview.
ReplyDeleteThanks for posting this.
ReplyDeleteGreat interview, Nancy! I'm looking forward to meeting Sarah, too, at this month's conference. I found Sarah's advice for writers to continue reading, writing and querying to be very encouraging. So many writers give up because of self-doubt or because they don't want to appear to be bothering editors.
ReplyDeleteI am up for bothering editors so I will be there at the WRITE NOW 2017 conference ready to learn everything she and the other fabulous presenters care to share!
DeleteGreat interview and information, Nancy.
ReplyDeleteNancy, for those of us who wonder what Editors are thinking, your interview fills in a lot of blanks. Thanks for asking the questions.
ReplyDelete